John Cunning, ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, eds. Stephen Gaukroger, ed. Dan Kaufman, ed. David Fate Norton and Jacqueline Taylor, eds. Elizabeth S.
- Industrial Heating March 2011;
- Clinical Aromatherapy: Essential Oils in Practice, Second Edition.
- Handbook of the coins of Great Britain and Ireland in the British Museum.
Radcliffe, ed. Saul Traiger, ed. Kenneth Winkler, ed. What is Descartes trying to achieve with his Meditations? What are his principal objectives and conclusions?
What function do the sceptical arguments play, and how does Descartes attempt to answer them? What is the intended role of the cogito , and what is it about the cogito that makes it suitable for this role? Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy Meditations pp. Hatfield , in the Core Reading, is an excellent guide, distinguishing epistemological, metaphysical, and cognitive interpretations.
The first three essays in Rorty are also helpful here. The fifth essay, by Michael Williams, focuses on the method of doubt.see
Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature - Bibliography - PhilPapers
At a more fine-grained level, you will want a good understanding of the various sceptical arguments of Meditation One and the famous cogito of Meditation Two. For classic discussions of the former, and more specifically, of the dreaming argument, see Blumenfeld and Blumenfeld and Stroud For discussion of Meditation One more generally, see Frankfurt Hintikka and Markie are classic pieces on the cogito. For more recent discussions of the sceptical arguments of Meditation One and the cogito of Meditation Two, try Owens and Peacocke respectively.
Cottingham, ed. Reprinted in Oxford Readings and Chappell. Are there any matters he should have called into doubt but did not? Are there any matters he did call into doubt but should not have?
The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise
Does it seem plausible to think that the meditator will find herself in the position that Descartes claims she will by the end of the First Meditation? It is in the nature of our mind to construct general propositions on the basis of our knowledge of particular ones. How, and why, does Descartes argue for the existence of God in the Third Meditation and then again in the Fifth Meditation? What, if anything, is wrong with these arguments?
Oh no, there's been an error
Does Descartes have a plausible account of why, if God is not a deceiver, we nevertheless make mistakes? NOTE: Your essay this week should set out brief answers to each part of the question, and offer a more in depth discussion of one of them—whichever one you find most interesting. You can safely skim the material on the so-called Cartesian circle, which we cover next week. As with last week, focus on the primary text, using Hatfield as a guide. Meditations Three to Five raise various other issues you might want to think about—concerning, for instance, innate ideas, modality, essences, and, especially, the Cartesian circle—but focus on these first.
Anthony Kenny 'Descartes on the Will' in R. Butler, ed. Cartesian Studies Blackwell. Reprinted in Oxford Readings. Peter Machamer and J. Reprinted in Chappell. Does Descartes have a conception of freedom of the will that can be applied consistently to God and to created thinking substances? Does Descartes have an adequate response to the charge that his validation of clear and distinct perception is problematically circular?
If you are working on this topic in more depth, Frankfurt is essential reading. The criticisms of the memory interpretation are widely accepted, but the alternative coherentist interpretation is not. Willis Doney, ed. Stewart Duncan and Antonia LoLordo, eds. What are the main doctrines of Cartesian Dualism?
Is it a viable theory, and what are its main problems? Reprinted in Chappell and Oxford Readings. For some critical discussion, see Dutton Saul Traiger has solicited an impressive collection of original essays covering all the parts of Hume? The authors include most of the world? Their work is authoritative, but is also very clearly presented, so that the volume will be accessible to college students as well useful for expert philosophers.
Highly recommended!? Vere Chappell, University of Massachusetts. Olaf College. New and Extraordinary? Help Centre. Track My Order. My Wishlist Sign In Join. Be the first to write a review. Add to Wishlist.
Shop now and earn 2 points per $1
Ships in 15 business days. Link Either by signing into your account or linking your membership details before your order is placed. Description Table of Contents Product Details Click on the cover image above to read some pages of this book! Stephen Buckle, Australian Catholic University?
Notes on Contributors. References to the Threatise, Abstract, and Enquiries.
Editor's Introduction. Part II: The Understanding:. Conclusion of this Book?
Part IV: Morals:. More Books in Philosophy See All.